OMERS - Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System

OMERS websitewww.omers.ca

  • September 25, 2006 - CUPE, OSSTF & OPSEU write joint letter to Premier

  • OMERS and Bill 206

    • What CUPE Ontario achieved with the Bill 206 campaign

      Through effective lobbying backed by a powerful mandate from members for political action, CUPE Ontario moved Bill 206 closer to what members of the OMERS pension plan need to be able to retire with dignity. And, where the bill falls short, we will have an independent review of the new governance structure enshrined in law.

      Cap on benefits lifted

      We convinced the government to remove Section 12 of the bill, which placed a cap on benefits for retirees and made any significant benefit improvement impossible. With that section removed, CUPE will be able, in future, to negotiate pension improvements similar to what is available in other public sector pension plans.

      Representation by population

      In the original Bill 206, CUPE was seriously under-represented on both the Sponsors Corporation and the Administration Corporation. We won representation by population on the Sponsors Corporation, which makes decisions about benefits and contribution rates. We expect our under-representation on the Administration Corporation to be corrected through the review process.

      Preventing cross-subsidization

      Cross-subsidization, where the majority of members in the basic plan would subsidize rich supplemental benefits for police and firefighters, was a real possibility under the original legislation. With the help of the NDP, we won an amendment that put language into the bill preventing cross-subsidization. It is also listed as a specific issue to be part of a future independent review of the new governance structure.

      Supplemental benefits for paramedics

      In 2005, paramedics finally won recognition as a public safety occupation under the federal income tax act. Somehow, the provincial government missed the news and left paramedics out of the original Bill 206. CUPE Ontario was able to win amendments that now give paramedics similar access as police and firefighters to supplement benefits. We believe that we will be able to use the independent review to pursue the outstanding issue of allowing paramedics the same normal retirement age of 60 in the OMERS basic plan. 

      Independent review enshrined in law

      The McGuinty government has agreed to introduce legislation no later than June 30, 2006 that will mandate an independent review of OMERS governance within six years of Bill 206 being passed. And, within three years, the minister of municipal affairs and housing will consult with unions and employer representatives to assess the progress in implementing the new structure.

      The timeframes are appropriate because the proposed Sponsors Corporation, which will make decisions about benefits and contribution rates, operates on a three-year cycle. Pension plan valuations are also conducted every three years.

      The reviewer, who will look at the effectiveness and fairness of decision-making structures, will be someone agreed to by the minister and employer and employee representatives. If they cannot agree, the person will be appointed by the Chief Justice.

      Issues for review include:

      §          the effectiveness and fairness of the overall governance framework

      §          decision-making by the Sponsors Corporation, including the provisions for mediation and arbitration

      §          the overall fairness of the OMERS pension plan and its financial stability, including making sure that supplemental benefits are not subsidized by the basic plan.

      Pension plan autonomy at last

      One thing that will not be under review is the general principle of transferring governance of OMERS from the province to the employee and employer members. When Bill 206 is passed, it will be the culmination of a campaign for pension plan autonomy that CUPE Ontario has waged for more than 10 years.

      Finally, CUPE members in municipalities, school boards and children’s aid societies are going to have the same right as members of other major public sector pension plans to autonomous management. It’s long overdue.

      CUPE members in OMERS have shown amazing strength and solidarity in the campaign for pension fairness. Your determination will help us through the implementation and review of the new OMERS governance structure and ensure that our remaining issues are addressed.

      Read the Hansard extract of Local 79's follow-up Deputation on Bill 206 Standing Committee on General Government.

      Read  the Hansard extract of Local 79's Deputation on Bill 206 to the Standing Committee on General Government.

    • OMERS Bill 206 Update

      LOCAL 79 GETS SEAT ON NEW OMERS SPONSORS CORPORATION

      Bill 206, the legislation which governs our OMERS pension plan, ensures that Local 79 has its own representation under the new OMERS governing structure. Bill 206 specifies that Local 79 has a seat on the Sponsors Corporation. This was achieved after Local 79 President Ann Dembinski and Vice-President/Chief Steward Tim Maguire made two deputations to the Standing Committee on General Government and met with Brad Duguid, M.P.P. and Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister responsible for Bill 206. The Local 79 seat is in recognition of the fact that our employer, the City of Toronto, has its own seat on the Sponsors Corporation.

      Governance of OMERS is now transferred from the province to the employee and employer members. We are going to have the same right as members of other major public sector pension plans to manage our own pension plan.

      Other important achievements for our members include:-

      • The McGuinty government agreeing to introduce legislation no later than June 30, 2006 that will mandate an independent review of OMERS governance within six years of Bill 206 being passed. And, within three years, the minister of municipal affairs and housing will consult with unions and employer representatives to assess the progress in implementing the new structure.
         

      • The removal of Section 12 of the bill, which placed a cap on benefits for retirees and made any significant benefit improvement impossible. With that section removed, the stakeholders will be able, in future, to negotiate pension improvements similar to what is available in other public sector pension plans.
         

      • An amendment that put language into the bill preventing cross-subsidization. This ensures that we are not subsidizing supplemental benefits for police and firefighters.

      Thank you - Local 79 members have shown amazing strength and solidarity in the campaign for pension fairness. Your determination will help us through the implementation and review of the new OMERS governance structure and ensure that our remaining issues are addressed.

  • February 2, 2006 - Letter to Local 79 members regarding OMERS Pension Plan
  • OMERS Investment Strategy
  • OMERS Update June 2004
  • OMERS 2004 Rates & FAQs

  • January 23, 2004 - Contribution Rates

    • January 23, 2004

      Mayor David Miller
      City of Toronto
      City Hall
      Toronto, Ontario

      Dear Mayor Miller:

      CUPE Local 79 has concerns about OMERS return to full contribution rates in 2004, a move that will significantly reduce the take home pay of our members and put a considerable dent into the City’s payroll budget.

      While OMERS has based this return to full contributions on "poor returns from investment markets over the past three years," their own reports would suggest that long term returns have been healthy. In 2002, the last year for which we have reporting, OMERS had a funding surplus of $4.45 Billion with annual retirement claims of approximately $1.3 Billion. Further, OMERS stated in its 2002 Annual Report that its long term returns of 9.1% over ten years were much healthier than the 6% they needed.

      The return to full contributions may have more to do with the change in Federal rules governing surpluses than the stable performance of OMERS.

      Federal pension laws were recently changed to allow pension fund surpluses to reach 125% before a contribution holiday becomes mandatory. We are concerned that OMERS is using this figure as a desirable target rather than a benchmark for triggering another pension holiday.

      While we can understand the prudence of establishing a reasonable contingency, we believe that it would have been more reasonable to follow the initial plan, which called for phased-in contributions.

      If OMERS feels it is prudent to move towards a surplus in the 120% range, it should do so by modest increments that would allow for its members to plan for the future while being able to pay their bills today.

      Despite the fact that the Province has already approved the 2004 rates, we would encourage the city to pursue this issue further. The OMERS Board has the jurisdiction to reverse its decision, and as a major stakeholder, the City of Toronto would be listened to.

      Yours truly,

      Ann Dembinski
      President.
       opeiu343/la